Foreign Minister: Central Europe fully backs Hungarian EU Presidency’s expansion plan

Meeting of the foreign ministers of the C5 format of the Central European countries, Austria, Czechia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia

Central European countries fully support Hungary’s policy of promoting the EU integration of Western Balkan countries during its EU presidency in the second half of the year, Péter Szijjártó, the foreign affairs and trade minister, said in Ljubljana on Tuesday.

EU presidency and the Western Balkans

He told a press conference after a meeting of the foreign ministers of the C5 format of the Central European countries, Austria, Czechia, Hungary, Slovakia, and Slovenia, that security must be reinforced, the European Union needs new vigour, and enlargement will be centre stage during Hungary’s presidency starting in July.

Integrating countries of the Western Balkans could energise the EU, and central European member states should take on special responsibility accordingly, according to a ministry statement quoted Szijjártó. He added that whereas they openly and genuinely backed enlargement, others elsewhere merely gave the impression of doing so in public while actually blocking the process.

Genuine supporters, he said, were in the minority, and so he urged central European countries to join forces and “promote the cause”. He said all sides at the meeting supported Hungary’s related goals.

Szijjártó noted that the five Western Balkan countries had been waiting to join the EU “for 14 years and 10 months on average”. “This shows the real attitude of the community,” he said, and pledged that Hungary would “work to change that vigorously”.

“We Hungarians will do everything to bring the Western Balkan countries closer to the European Union,” he said.

Immigration

On the subject of restoring security, Szijjártó called for increased efforts to stop illegal immigration, and said its causes should be dealt with in the countries of origin, while protection of the external borders should be intensified “just as Hungary has done”.

He said the Hungarian government considered border violations as attacks against the country’s sovereignty, adding that rounding up people smuggling gangs was crucial.

“Criminals and migrans have fired shots at border guards on several occasions, which is completely unacceptable… We do not need such people in the EU,” he said.

The minister said pull factors of illegal migration should be reduced, adding that mandatory distribution quotas “act in just that way”.

Gaza, Ukraine

Answering a question, Szijjártó confirmed the government’s support for any initiative aimed at freeing hostages held in Gaza, including a Hungarian national.

The success of Israel’s anti-terrorism operation, he said, was of global importance, but “saving the civilians should also be an important aspect.”

Regarding Ukraine, he mentioned that over one million refugees had crossed into Hungary since the outbreak of the war. He said “neither side can win on the battlefield” and the armed conflict could only be resolved through negotiations; “the question remains when, and it would be sooner than later.” “The sooner there is a ceasefire and peace talks, the fewer people will die and destruction will be less detrimental.”

One comment

  1. Spoken by the TAKER who incidentally also has the habit of vetoing the other twenty six (26) Members decisions on a regular basis.

    https://www.statista.com/chart/18794/net-contributors-to-eu-budget/https://www.statista.com/chart/18794/net-contributors-to-eu-budget/

    I am sure all the other Members cannot wait to invite more veto wielding states that require lots of cash (Hungary is not contributing so what do our Politicians care – not our money, right – we just need free EU funds to pay teachers, doctors, reduce our deficit….) and politically have a bias of sorts towards Mr. Putin.

    Interesting snippet:

    https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/russias-influence-balkans

    Media bias: “Overall, we rate the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Least Biased based on balanced story selection; however, editorial positions slightly lean left but still fall within least biased. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information, a clean fact check record, and being a resource for IFCN fact-checkers.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *